Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Kia Picanto 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 66 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Skoda Citigo engine produces 6 HP less power than Kia Picanto, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 870 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Citigo has 51 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The Kia Picanto may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |