Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 30 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller. Skoda Citigo is 34 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Skoda Citigo has 177 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |