Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Fiat 500 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Fiat 500 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 45 HP less power than Fiat 500, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Fiat 500. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat 500, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat 500. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.56 m | 3.57 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Citigo and Fiat 500 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 185 litres | |
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Skoda Citigo has 66 litres more trunk space than the Fiat 500. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 915 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Fiat 500 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Citigo, so Fiat 500 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 4800 | 12 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Fiat 500 has
| |