Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 60 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 900 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | 7.3 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.5 | 3.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Skoda Citigo petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 44 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 315 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Skoda Citigo has 64 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Skoda Citigo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`310 | ~ 1`626 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |