Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Toyota Yaris 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol, lPG) | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 69 - 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 900 NM | 93 - 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | 11.7 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.5 | 4.1 - 4.8 | |
|
Skoda Citigo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller. Skoda Citigo is 32 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 286 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Skoda Citigo has 35 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`310 | ~ 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Yaris scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Yaris scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |