Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Suzuki Alto 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol, lPG) | 1.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 900 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | 14 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.5 | 4.4 - 5.2 | |
|
Skoda Citigo petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Alto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is larger. Skoda Citigo is 6 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 129 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Skoda Citigo has 122 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`310 | ~ 1`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests, but Suzuki Alto is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |