Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Opel Karl 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 900 NM | 95 - 96 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | 13.9 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.5 | 4.3 - 4.6 | |
|
Skoda Citigo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Karl. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 11 cm shorter than the Opel Karl, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1013 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Citigo has 45 litres more trunk space than the Opel Karl. The Opel Karl may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`310 | ~ 1`372 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests, but Opel Karl is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Opel Karl has
| |