Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Kia Picanto 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol, lPG) | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 67 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 900 NM | 96 - 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | 10.1 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.5 | 4.2 - 5.4 | |
|
Skoda Citigo petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1010 litres | |
| Skoda Citigo has 4 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`310 | ~ 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests, but Kia Picanto is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |