Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Toyota Aygo 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skoda Citigo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Aygo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 - 14.4 seconds | 14.2 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.2 | 4.5 - 4.6 | |
|
Skoda Citigo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is larger, but slightly lower. Skoda Citigo is 15 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 782 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Skoda Citigo has 112 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`290 | ~ 1`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |