Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Suzuki Splash 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Skoda Citigo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Splash has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 68 - 94 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 90 - 118 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 - 14.4 seconds | 12 - 14.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.2 | 4.7 - 5.7 | |
Skoda Citigo petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Splash. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.56 m | 3.78 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.59 m | |
Skoda Citigo is smaller. Skoda Citigo is 21 cm shorter than the Suzuki Splash, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 202 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 573 litres | |
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Citigo has 49 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The Suzuki Splash may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`290 | ~ 1`485 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | high | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |