Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skoda Citigo is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan Micra has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 - 14.4 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.2 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
|
Skoda Citigo petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller. Skoda Citigo is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1132 litres | |
| Skoda Citigo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`290 | ~ 1`454 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |