Seat Tarraco 2019 vs BMW X3 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Tarraco engine produces 20 HP less power than BMW X3, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Seat Tarraco reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Tarraco) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW X3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW X3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of BMW X3 2021 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Tarraco is 2 cm longer than the BMW X3, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 760 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
760 litres | 1600 litres | |
| Seat Tarraco has 210 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 840 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Tarraco is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`230 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`541 kg | 1`710 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 689 kg | 620 kg | |
| Seat Tarraco load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than BMW X3. Therefore, Seat Tarraco is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 43 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Tarraco has
|
BMW X3 has
| |