Seat Mii 2012 vs Toyota Aygo 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Mii is more dynamic to drive. Seat Mii engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Seat Mii reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Mii consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that by driving the Seat Mii over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Mii consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2009 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Seat Mii is larger. Seat Mii is 14 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Seat Mii is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 139 litres | |
|
Seat Mii has more luggage capacity. Seat Mii has 112 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Mii is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Seat Mii can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`190 kg | |
| Net weight: | 857 kg | 830 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 433 kg | 360 kg | |
| Seat Mii load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Toyota Aygo. Therefore, Seat Mii is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Seat Mii has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Mii, so Seat Mii quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Mii has
|
| |