Seat Mii 2012 vs Skoda Citigo 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Mii is more dynamic to drive. Seat Mii engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Seat Mii reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Mii is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Mii consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Mii could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Mii consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Mii and Skoda Citigo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Mii has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Citigo, so Seat Mii quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Mii has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |