Seat Mii 2012 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Mii and Skoda Citigo have the same engine power, but Seat Mii torque is 3 NM less than Skoda Citigo. Seat Mii reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Mii consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Mii could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Mii and Skoda Citigo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Mii has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Citigo, so Seat Mii quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |