Seat Mii 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 - 95 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 - 15.3 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.5 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Seat Mii petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Seat Mii is smaller. Seat Mii is 41 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Seat Mii has 29 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Mii is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Seat Mii can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`290 | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Polo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Mii has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |