Seat Mii 2012 vs Kia Picanto 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 69 - 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 - 95 NM | 94 - 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 - 15.3 seconds | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 4.5 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Seat Mii petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Seat Mii is 4 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 605 litres | |
|
Seat Mii has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Mii has 51 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The Kia Picanto may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`290 | ~ 1`335 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Picanto scores higher in safety tests. The Seat Mii scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Mii has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |