Seat Inca 1995 vs Volkswagen Polo 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 124 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
Seat Inca and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Seat Inca torque is 1 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Seat Inca reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
910 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 700'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.64 m | |
Height: | no data | 1.43 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 1436 litres | 390 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
Seat Inca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Inca has 1046 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`105 | 1`620 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Inca has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |