Seat Inca 1995 vs Volkswagen Polo 1997

 
Seat Inca
1995 - 2000
Volkswagen Polo
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 64 HP64 HP
Torque: 125 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 20 seconds16.9 seconds
Seat Inca and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Seat Inca torque is 1 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Seat Inca reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.1
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres45 litres
910 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 700'000 km700'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years14 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.14 m
Width: no data1.64 m
Height: no data1.43 m
Trunk capacity: 1436 litres390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1250 litres
Seat Inca has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Inca has 1046 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`1051`620
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Seat Inca has
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv