Seat Inca 1995 vs VAZ 2104 1984
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 92 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20 seconds | 23 seconds | |
|
Seat Inca is more dynamic to drive. Seat Inca and VAZ 2104 have the same engine power, but Seat Inca torque is 33 NM more than VAZ 2104. Seat Inca reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Inca) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2104) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.44 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1436 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`105 | 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Inca has
|
| |