Seat Inca 1995 vs Citroen Berlingo 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20 seconds | 19.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Inca engine produces 5 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Seat Inca reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Inca engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 306 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Inca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Seat Inca engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1436 litres | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2800 litres | |
|
Seat Inca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Inca has 812 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. The Citroen Berlingo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`105 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Inca has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |