Seat Inca 1995 vs Volkswagen Polo 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Inca engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Seat Inca reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Toledo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Volkswagen Polo 2000 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1436 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Seat Inca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Inca has 1046 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`080 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Inca has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |