Seat Inca 1995 vs Fiat Marea 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 135 NM | 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Fiat Marea is a more dynamic driving. Seat Inca engine produces 28 HP less power than Fiat Marea, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Fiat Marea. Due to the lower power, Seat Inca reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 63 litres | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Inca engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Used also on Fiat Brava | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Inca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.74 m | |
Height: | no data | 1.50 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 1436 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`080 | 1`795 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Inca has
|
Fiat Marea has
| |