Seat Inca 1995 vs Volkswagen Polo 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat Inca is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Polo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 60 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 135 NM | 116 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 - 20 seconds | 11.1 - 17.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.2 - 8.6 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1436 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Seat Inca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Inca has 1046 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The Volkswagen Polo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`073 | ~ 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Inca has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |