Seat Inca 1995 vs Citroen Berlingo 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 75 HP | 69 - 108 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 - 135 NM | 111 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 - 20 seconds | 11.2 - 19.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.5 - 8.9 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1436 litres | 624 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2800 litres | |
|
Seat Inca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Inca has 812 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. The Citroen Berlingo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`073 | ~ 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Inca has
|
| |