Seat Ibiza 1993 vs Mazda 323 1989

 
Seat Ibiza
1993 - 1996
Mazda 323
1989 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 116 HP106 HP
Torque: 166 NM151 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds8.8 seconds
Seat Ibiza engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mazda 323. Despite the higher power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
600 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Toledo, Seat CordobaUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ibiza might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m4.26 m
Width: 1.64 m1.68 m
Height: 1.42 m1.34 m
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but higher.
Seat Ibiza is 45 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 270 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
580 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`550
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably better
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Seat Ibiza has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mazda 323 has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv