Seat Ibiza 1993 vs Skoda Felicia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Toledo, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Felicia, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |