Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 13 HP less power than Mazda 323, but torque is 11 NM more than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but higher. Seat Ibiza is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 309 litres | |
|
Mazda 323 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 39 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |