Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP more power than Peugeot 306, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Toledo, Seat Cordoba | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Seat Ibiza 1996 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Seat Ibiza 1996 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but higher. Seat Ibiza is 18 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
802 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 70 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 1.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |