Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 58 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 18.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 92 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 10.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Seat Ibiza 1996 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Seat Ibiza 1996 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 13 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
802 litres | 960 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 64 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |