Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 58 HP | |
Torque: | 166 NM | 95 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 18.7 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 58 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 5.2 | |
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
730 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 13 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 206 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
580 litres | 960 litres | |
Seat Ibiza has 64 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 380 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`390 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Micra, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |