Seat Ibiza 1997 vs Rover 200 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 86 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 24 HP more power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Rover 200. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.6 | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 304 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
802 litres | 1086 litres | |
Rover 200 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 34 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 284 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Rover 200 has
| |