Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Rover 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 4 HP more power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Rover 200. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.6 | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Audi A6, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra | Used also on Rover 400 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ibiza might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
802 litres | 1086 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ibiza has 151 litres more trunk space than the Rover 200. The Rover 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 284 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
| |