Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 58 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 18.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 32 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza 1996 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Seat Ibiza 1996 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 13 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
802 litres | 960 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 249 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`530 | 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |