Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Rover 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 22 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.6 | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | Used also on Rover 400 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Ibiza might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Rover 200 has
| |