Seat Ibiza 1997 vs Peugeot 306 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 135 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
Peugeot 306 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP less power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Peugeot 306. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.8 | |
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Ibiza consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
650 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 4.03 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but higher. Seat Ibiza is 18 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 1.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |