Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Rover 200 1996

 
Seat Ibiza
1996 - 1998
Rover 200
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP112 HP
Torque: 140 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds9.9 seconds
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Ibiza engine produces 12 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.87.2
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
750 km on highway890 km on highway
Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.85 m3.97 m
Width: 1.64 m1.69 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Seat Ibiza is smaller.
Seat Ibiza is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres304 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
802 litres1086 litres
Rover 200 has more luggage space.
Seat Ibiza has 34 litres less trunk space than the Rover 200. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 200 (by 284 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4651`510
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Seat Ibiza has
  • better manoeuvrability
Rover 200 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv