Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Rover 200 1996

 
Seat Ibiza
1996 - 1999
Rover 200
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP103 HP
Torque: 116 NM127 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15 seconds10.7 seconds
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Ibiza engine produces 43 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.67.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km8.1 l/100km
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway920 km on highway
630 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.85 m3.97 m
Width: 1.64 m1.69 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Seat Ibiza is smaller.
Seat Ibiza is 12 cm shorter than the Rover 200, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data304 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1086 litres
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 200, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`480
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Seat Ibiza has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Rover 200 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv