Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 103 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan Micra, but torque is 13 NM more than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 13 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 206 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 960 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |