Seat Ibiza 1996 vs Ford KA 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza and Ford KA have the same engine power, but Seat Ibiza torque is 11 NM more than Ford KA. Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger. Seat Ibiza is 23 cm longer than the Ford KA, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 186 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 724 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Ford KA has
| |