Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Rover 25 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 10 HP more power than Rover 25, but torque is 5 NM less than Rover 25. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 25, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 25. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 25 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6, Seat Alhambra, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Accord, Land Rover Freelander, Rover 45 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller. Seat Ibiza is 11 cm shorter than the Rover 25, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
785 litres | 1086 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 54 litres less trunk space than the Rover 25. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 25 (by 301 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Rover 25, which means Seat Ibiza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`585 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Rover 25 has
| |