Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Seat Ibiza 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza 1999 is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza 1999 engine produces 26 HP more power than Seat Ibiza 2002, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Seat Ibiza 2002. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza 1999 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza 1999 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza 1999 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 610'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Ibiza 2002 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Volkswagen Bora, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza 1999 is smaller. Seat Ibiza 1999 is 7 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza 2002, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza 1999 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza 1999 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza 2002. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ibiza 2002 (by 248 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`555 | 1`620 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |