Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 12 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza is 7 cm longer than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Ibiza has 260 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Seat Ibiza uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`505 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |