Seat Ibiza 1999 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 46 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ibiza is 7 cm longer than the Renault Clio, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
782 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Ibiza has 260 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Seat Ibiza uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |