Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 37 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Seat Ibiza is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | no data | |
| Seat Ibiza has 5 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |