Seat Ibiza 2004 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 70 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2003 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger. Seat Ibiza is 14 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |