Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 23 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger. Seat Ibiza is 14 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |