Seat Ibiza 2002 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Seat Ibiza engine produces 4 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Seat Ibiza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger. Seat Ibiza is 14 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 10 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Renault Clio has
| |