Seat Ibiza 2006 vs BMW 1 series 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is more dynamic to drive. Seat Ibiza engine produces 34 HP more power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 70 NM more than BMW 1 series. Thanks to more power Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 1 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Ibiza) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Ibiza is 28 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 63 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 1 series (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 1 series, which means Seat Ibiza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| BMW 1 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW 1 series, so BMW 1 series quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |