Seat Ibiza 2006 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Ibiza is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ibiza is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Seat Ibiza has 3 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |