Seat Ibiza 2006 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Ibiza engine produces 67 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Seat Ibiza reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Ibiza consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Ibiza could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Ibiza consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Ibiza is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Ibiza is 42 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1030 litres | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Seat Ibiza has 57 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 470 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ibiza is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`552 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 695 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ibiza has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |